• Weird QWK

    From Beta2K@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to All on Friday, March 02, 2007 18:57:00
    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs in my QWK packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the message pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For that fact, the subs above #9 all have their original pointer dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Beta

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Deuce@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/SYNCNIX to Beta2K on Saturday, March 03, 2007 01:12:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Beta2K to All on Fri Mar 02 2007 06:57 pm

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs in my QWK packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the message pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For that fact, the subs above #9 all have their original pointer dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Possibly you haven't "caught up" yet. When you set your pointers way back, you get your subs one at a time.

    Keep touching data/qnet/VERT.now until you don't get any new messages.


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ My Brand-New BBS
  • From Beta2K@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Deuce on Saturday, March 03, 2007 19:10:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Deuce to Beta2K on Sat Mar 03 2007 01:12 am

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs in my QWK packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the message pointe were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For tha fact, the subs above #9 all have their original pointer dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Possibly you haven't "caught up" yet. When you set your pointers way back, get your subs one at a time.

    Keep touching data/qnet/VERT.now until you don't get any new messages.

    It's been doing it's poll atleast once a day (I can't rmmeber exactly) for atleast 2 weeks...

    Beta


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Beta2K on Monday, March 05, 2007 19:46:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Beta2K to All on Fri Mar 02 2007 06:57 pm

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs in my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the message pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their original pointer dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #23:
    The San Francisco Cable cars are the only mobile national monument.
    Norco, CA WX: 68.5øF, 19% humidity, 0 mph NNW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Beta2K@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Digital Man on Thursday, March 08, 2007 08:57:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Digital Man to Beta2K on Mon Mar 05 2007 07:46 pm

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs in
    my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the message pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first
    callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their original pointer dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    They're all there, and I assume that the CVS copy of the data directory has the proper conference #'s so I'm really lost on why it's not updating those last subs...
    Beta


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Beta2K on Thursday, March 08, 2007 15:16:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Beta2K to Digital Man on Thu Mar 08 2007 08:57 am

    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Digital Man to Beta2K on Mon Mar 05 2007 07:46 pm

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs in my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the message pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their original pointer dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    They're all there, and I assume that the CVS copy of the data directory has proper conference #'s so I'm really lost on why it's not updating those last subs...

    What's your BBS's QWK-ID? I'll check the QWKnet account here on Vert.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #4:
    Slugs have 4 noses.
    Norco, CA WX: 85.4øF, 26% humidity, 0 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Beta2K@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Digital Man on Sunday, March 11, 2007 21:17:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Digital Man to Beta2K on Thu Mar 08 2007 03:16 pm

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 subs my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the messag pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their original poin dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    They're all there, and I assume that the CVS copy of the data directory h proper conference #'s so I'm really lost on why it's not updating those l subs...

    What's your BBS's QWK-ID? I'll check the QWKnet account here on Vert.

    Cerberus, thanks DM

    Beta

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Beta2K on Monday, March 12, 2007 12:29:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Beta2K to Digital Man on Sun Mar 11 2007 07:17 pm

    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Digital Man to Beta2K on Thu Mar 08 2007 03:16 pm

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first 9 s my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the mes pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the first callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their original p dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    They're all there, and I assume that the CVS copy of the data director proper conference #'s so I'm really lost on why it's not updating thos subs...

    What's your BBS's QWK-ID? I'll check the QWKnet account here on Vert.

    Cerberus, thanks DM

    The account looks fine. Have you tried logging on via Telnet with that account and double-checking the QWK scan configuration?

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #73:
    The average person spends 2 weeks of it's life waiting for a traffic light to change.
    Norco, CA WX: 119.4øF, ---% humidity, 0 mph W wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Beta2K@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Digital Man on Monday, March 12, 2007 21:22:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Digital Man to Beta2K on Mon Mar 12 2007 10:29 am

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the first my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and the pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the fi callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their origina dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    They're all there, and I assume that the CVS copy of the data direc proper conference #'s so I'm really lost on why it's not updating t subs...

    What's your BBS's QWK-ID? I'll check the QWKnet account here on Vert.

    Cerberus, thanks DM

    The account looks fine. Have you tried logging on via Telnet with that accou and double-checking the QWK scan configuration?

    Yup I did. I'm totally confused... Thinking about resetting the pointers again and dumping the entire message base, start from scratch.

    Beta

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Beta2K on Tuesday, March 13, 2007 15:35:00
    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Beta2K to Digital Man on Mon Mar 12 2007 07:22 pm

    Re: Weird QWK
    By: Digital Man to Beta2K on Mon Mar 12 2007 10:29 am

    Anyone want to take a stab at why I'm only getting the fir my QW packets altho I have Vert setup to scan all 21 and t pointers were set as far back as possible before doing the callout? For that fact, subs above #9 all have their orig dates, where the first 9 have newer dates.

    Check SCFG->Networks->QWK->Hubs->VERT->Sub-boards.

    They're all there, and I assume that the CVS copy of the data di proper conference #'s so I'm really lost on why it's not updatin subs...

    What's your BBS's QWK-ID? I'll check the QWKnet account here on Ver

    Cerberus, thanks DM

    The account looks fine. Have you tried logging on via Telnet with that ac and double-checking the QWK scan configuration?

    Yup I did. I'm totally confused... Thinking about resetting the pointers again and dumping the entire message base, start from scratch.

    I just logged on via Telnet as Cerberus and created a 2.5MB message packet (10000 messages). Each packet is limited to 10,000 messages, so need to download several packets to get the entire contents of the DOVE-Net message subs on Vertrauen. I think you just need to force some more QWKnet call-outs and you'll get them all.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #103:
    Frowning burns more calories then smiling.
    Norco, CA WX: 116.2øF, 12% humidity, 0 mph WNW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net