• Re: New Board

    From Top Gun@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/HALNETDA to Earl on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:50:00
    Hello everyone,
    I just finished getting my BBS up and running and everything seems fine on this
    end. Looking forward to talking to everyone.

    Earl
    sysop Fishermans BBS located in NW Arkansas
    telenet://fisherma.synchro.net


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Fishermans BBS - 208.180.158.11
    Hi Earl, Ron here. Got your invite and will try to login soon. I havae just set up my bbs also. I used to run a dos bbs back in the 80's. I had close to 1000 users and it was fun. Setting up was a bit tricky now since Windows use causes one to forget the old dos commands. Windows makes one lazy. I am having some difficulties with telnet file xfers. Is yours working? If you can tell me what you did to make it work, it would be helpful

    rOn
    halnet datagrid bbs
    telnet://halnet.servebbs.com
    http://halnet.servebbs.com

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ HALNET DATAGRID BBS
  • From Sniper@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/KIA to Top Gun on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 23:29:00
    Top Gun wrote to Earl <=-

    Windows makes one lazy. I am having some difficulties with telnet file xfers. Is yours working? If you can tell me what you did to make it work, it would be helpful

    Your telnet file transfers may never work correctly. Depends on what
    ISP your using, and what kind of DSL/Cable modem you've got. I've
    tried 2 different setups, the Westell DSL Modem, and I now have a
    Netopia DSL modem. Neither of these seem to allow telnet <Zmodem etc.>
    type transfers. The systems connect, and the transfer starts, but, it
    then times out. The only reason for it seems to be that some routers
    just aren't using the protocol 100%. FTP and HTTP (which uses FTP) work great, so, I just get my users to use that instead. Minor thing, and it hasn't stopped my users from getting to the files...





    ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.46
    þ Synchronet þ Killed In Action - telnet://kiabbs.org
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Sniper on Thursday, July 26, 2007 00:41:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Sniper to Top Gun on Wed Jul 25 2007 11:29 pm

    Top Gun wrote to Earl <=-

    Windows makes one lazy. I am having some difficulties with telnet file xfers. Is yours working? If you can tell me what you did to make it work, it would be helpful

    Your telnet file transfers may never work correctly. Depends on what
    ISP your using, and what kind of DSL/Cable modem you've got. I've
    tried 2 different setups, the Westell DSL Modem, and I now have a
    Netopia DSL modem. Neither of these seem to allow telnet <Zmodem etc.>
    type transfers. The systems connect, and the transfer starts, but, it
    then times out.

    If you can connect via Telnet, then you should be able to transfer files. There's nothing abou the ISP or router that would interfere with that.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #79:
    There are 119 grooves on the edge of a quarter.
    Norco, CA WX: 71.7øF, 58% humidity, 0 mph NE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Top Gun@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/HALNETDA to Sniper on Thursday, July 26, 2007 03:25:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Sniper to Top Gun on Thu Jul 26 2007 00:29:00

    Top Gun wrote to Earl <=-

    Windows makes one lazy. I am having some difficulties with telnet file xfers. Is yours working? If you can tell me what you did to make it work, it would be helpful

    Your telnet file transfers may never work correctly. Depends on what
    ISP your using, and what kind of DSL/Cable modem you've got. I've
    tried 2 different setups, the Westell DSL Modem, and I now have a
    Netopia DSL modem. Neither of these seem to allow telnet <Zmodem etc.>
    type transfers. The systems connect, and the transfer starts, but, it
    then times out. The only reason for it seems to be that some routers
    just aren't using the protocol 100%. FTP and HTTP (which uses FTP) work great, so, I just get my users to use that instead. Minor thing, and it hasn't stopped my users from getting to the files...





    ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
    OK Thanks for the input Sniper.
    I was thinking that the ftp is probably the best anyway. Clean Fast and reliable. Ok..Very interesting theory on the modems though..geez guess nothing works like the old days..

    rOn

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ HALNET DATAGRID BBS
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Top Gun on Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:43:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Top Gun to Sniper on Thu Jul 26 2007 03:25 am

    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Sniper to Top Gun on Thu Jul 26 2007 00:29:00

    Top Gun wrote to Earl <=-

    Windows makes one lazy. I am having some difficulties with telnet f xfers. Is yours working? If you can tell me what you did to make i work, it would be helpful

    Your telnet file transfers may never work correctly. Depends on what
    ISP your using, and what kind of DSL/Cable modem you've got. I've
    tried 2 different setups, the Westell DSL Modem, and I now have a
    Netopia DSL modem. Neither of these seem to allow telnet <Zmodem etc.> type transfers. The systems connect, and the transfer starts, but, it then times out. The only reason for it seems to be that some routers just aren't using the protocol 100%. FTP and HTTP (which uses FTP) work great, so, I just get my users to use that instead. Minor thing, and it hasn't stopped my users from getting to the files...





    ... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
    OK Thanks for the input Sniper.
    I was thinking that the ftp is probably the best anyway. Clean Fast and reliable. Ok..Very interesting theory on the modems though..geez guess noth works like the old days..

    If X/Y/Zmodem file transfers aren't working then something is either
    configured wrong with the Zmodem driver (SEXYZ?) on the BBS or there's a problem with the telnet client. Not all telnet clients support file transfers, and even those that do are not all equal in their abilities.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #176:
    The first bike was called a hobbyhorse.
    Norco, CA WX: 86.5øF, 51% humidity, 0 mph NE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net
  • From Top Gun@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/HALNETDA to Digital Man on Saturday, July 28, 2007 10:04:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Sniper to Top Gun on Wed Jul 25 2007 11:29 pm

    Top Gun wrote to Earl <=-

    Windows makes one lazy. I am having some difficulties with telnet
    file
    xfers. Is yours working? If you can tell me what you did to make
    it
    work, it would be helpful

    Your telnet file transfers may never work correctly. Depends on what
    ISP your using, and what kind of DSL/Cable modem you've got. I've
    tried 2 different setups, the Westell DSL Modem, and I now have a
    Netopia DSL modem. Neither of these seem to allow telnet <Zmodem etc.> type transfers. The systems connect, and the transfer starts, but, it then times out.

    If you can connect via Telnet, then you should be able to transfer files. There's nothing abou the ISP or router that would interfere with that.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)
    I have them working. I made changes to the protocol cmd lines that should
    not have been made. The problem of xfers is probably more related to the terminal configuration that you use.

    Snapple "Real Fact" #79:
    There are 119 grooves on the edge of a quarter.
    Norco, CA WX: 71.7øF, 58% humidity, 0 mph NE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ HALNET DATAGRID BBS
  • From Beta@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/CERBERUS to Sniper on Friday, August 03, 2007 06:35:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Sniper to Top Gun on Wed Jul 25 2007 11:29 pm

    just aren't using the protocol 100%. FTP and HTTP (which uses FTP) work

    Just a quick correction, HTTP is not FTP. They're very different protocols, in the case of Sync you can browse the FTP via HTTP, but it's still using HTTP.

    Beta

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Linux, the way of the future
  • From Beta@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/CERBERUS to Top Gun on Friday, August 03, 2007 06:39:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Top Gun to Sniper on Thu Jul 26 2007 03:25 am

    OK Thanks for the input Sniper.
    I was thinking that the ftp is probably the best anyway. Clean Fast and reliable. Ok..Very interesting theory on the modems though..geez guess noth works like the old days..

    It's much more likly that FTP will fail then HTTP due to routers performing NAT. If your computers are in a off-net subnet like 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168..0.0/16, ect then you have a router infront of you doing NAT (Network Address Translation). Because of this, and because FTP normally uses two ports (20 and 21), the path through your NAT doesn't always get setup for the second port. Some routers are good at this, some aren't. Using passive mode in FTP will generally get around this, but HTTP is still more reliable as it doesn't have any of these weirdnessses in it's protocol.

    Beta

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Linux, the way of the future
  • From Tracker1@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/TRN to Beta on Friday, August 03, 2007 12:02:00
    Beta wrote:
    just aren't using the protocol 100%. FTP and HTTP (which uses FTP) work

    Just a quick correction, HTTP is not FTP. They're very different protocols, in
    the case of Sync you can browse the FTP via HTTP, but it's still using HTTP.

    Minor correction, can browse ftp with a web browser (html) but still using FTP. ;)

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net icq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email)

    ... Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #188: Never bet on a race you haven't fixed

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it
  • From Tracker1@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT/TRN to Beta on Friday, August 03, 2007 12:03:00
    Beta wrote:
    It's much more likly that FTP will fail then HTTP due to routers performing NAT. If your computers are in a off-net subnet like 10.0.0.0/8, 192.168..0.0/16, ect then you have a router infront of you doing NAT (Network Address Translation). Because of this, and because FTP normally uses two ports
    (20 and 21), the path through your NAT doesn't always get setup for the second
    port. Some routers are good at this, some aren't. Using passive mode in FTP will generally get around this, but HTTP is still more reliable as it doesn't have any of these weirdnessses in it's protocol.

    I think the weirdness for PASV ftp was so that server to server transfers could be initiated remotely.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net icq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email)

    ... Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #42: Only negotiate when you are certain to profit

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it
  • From Digital Man@TIME/RCYLBBS1/VERT to Beta on Friday, August 03, 2007 13:42:00
    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Beta to Sniper on Fri Aug 03 2007 06:35 am

    Re: Re: New Board
    By: Sniper to Top Gun on Wed Jul 25 2007 11:29 pm

    just aren't using the protocol 100%. FTP and HTTP (which uses FTP) work

    Just a quick correction, HTTP is not FTP. They're very different protocols, the case of Sync you can browse the FTP via HTTP, but it's still using HTTP.

    Correction: you can browse the FTP via HTML, but it's still using FTP.

    digital man (xbox-live: digitlman)

    Snapple "Real Fact" #95:
    Squids can have eyeballs the size of volleyballs.
    Norco, CA WX: 93.3øF, 44% humidity, 5 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ telnet://vert.synchro.net